Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Barbier Gazeu vs Fons Van Sambeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gazeu vs Sambeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Barbier Gazeu vs Fons Van Sambeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gazeu 1 - 0 Sambeek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gazeu has won 47.28% of points on their second serve, while Sambeek has won 35.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gazeu, in recent form, has won 45.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sambeek has won 51.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.81% and 26.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gazeu has saved 48.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sambeek has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gazeu has won 31.25% of matches played (W/L 5/ 11), with Sambeek winning 50% (W/L 16/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gazeu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9). Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 12/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Gazeu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 31.25% of matches (W/L 5/ 11), where as Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gazeu winning 1 times and Sambeek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gazeu winning 2 and Sambeek winning 0. The last match between Gazeu and Sambeek was at the M25 Deauville, 22-05-2024, First, Clay with Paul Barbier Gazeu getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gazeu and Sambeek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gazeu winning 0 times and Sambeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gazeu winning 0, and Sambeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gazeu has played against opponents with an average rank of 116.25 while Sambeek has played against players with an average rank of 104.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gazeu has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sambeek has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gazeu has converted 41.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sambeek has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
24% (6-19)
Career Total W/L
53% (35-31)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Paul Barbier Gazeu | Fons Van Sambeek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (38/69) | 78% (50/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (28/38) | 56% (28/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 36% (5/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (31/64) | 38% (26/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Barbier Gazeu | Fons Van Sambeek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (10/13) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (97/115) | 35% (7/13) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 169.09 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (405/629) | 78% (50/64) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (259/405) | 56% (28/50) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (106/224) | 36% (5/14) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (24/61) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (241/625) | 38% (26/69) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Paul Barbier Gazeu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simon Anthony Ivanov
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
63%
(
10 of
16)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
42%
(
5 of
12)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
21
Total Points Won
17
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Stefan Vujic
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Antoine Berger
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Pujol Navarro
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Perry Gregg
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Nick Lagaev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Capalbo
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(7) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Danil Panarin
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Felipe Pinzon Moreno
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olle Wallin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gazeu Vs Sambeek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
